Overall Survey Results:


Cellulosic biofuels and technologies


1Rate the technology in terms of commercial readiness. 
 
 1 = Don't know , 2 = Will never be commercial , 3 = Will be commercial one day, not now , 4 = Commercially viable now , 5 = Best in class
Answer
12345
Number of
  Responses
Rating
Score*
Abengoa Bioenergy
   
232 3.1
American Process
   
227 2.0
Beta Renewables
   
229 2.9
Bio CNG
   
213 1.5
Borregaard
   
221 2.0
Clariant
   
224 2.2
Cobalt Technologies
   
219 1.9
Cool Planet Energy Systems
   
226 2.1
DuPont Biofuels Solutions
   
232 3.2
Edeniq
   
223 1.8
*The Rating Score is the weighted average calculated by dividing the sum of all weighted ratings by the number of total responses.
2Rate the technology in terms of commercial readiness. 
 
 1 = Don't know , 2 = Will never be commercial , 3 = Will be commercial one day, not now , 4 = Commercially viable now , 5 = Best in class
Answer
12345
Number of
  Responses
Rating
Score*
Enerkem
   
223 2.5
Fiberight
   
217 1.9
Fulcrum Bioenergy
   
216 1.8
Granbio
   
228 2.5
Green Biologics
   
220 1.7
ICM
   
220 2.1
Inbicon
   
219 2.1
INEOS Bio
   
219 2.3
Iogen
   
230 2.2
Licella
   
216 1.3
*The Rating Score is the weighted average calculated by dividing the sum of all weighted ratings by the number of total responses.
3Rate the technology in terms of commercial readiness. 
 
 1 = Don't know , 2 = Will never be commercial , 3 = Will be commercial one day, not now , 4 = Commercially viable now , 5 = Best in class
Answer
12345
Number of
  Responses
Rating
Score*
Lignotech
   
216 1.5
Mascoma
   
224 2.0
Mercurius
   
212 1.3
Primus Green Energy
   
210 1.5
POET DSM
   
239 3.4
Praj Industries
   
216 1.8
Solena Fuels
   
213 1.5
Sundrop Fuels
   
215 1.6
UPM
   
212 1.7
ZeaChem
   
226 2.0
*The Rating Score is the weighted average calculated by dividing the sum of all weighted ratings by the number of total responses.
4If you rated the technology "will never" or "not now" in terms of commercial readiness, where are you most skeptical? 
 
 1 = Viable CAPEX/OPEX , 2 = Feedstock Costs , 3 = Feedstock availability , 4 = Insufficient rates, titers, yields etc , 5 = Viable marlet for the products
Answer
12345
Number of
  Responses
Rating
Score*
Abengoa Bioenergy
   
103 2.4
American Process
   
98 2.7
Beta Renewables
   
94 2.6
Bio CNG
   
64 2.5
Borregaard
   
66 2.9
Clariant
   
87 2.5
Cobalt Technologies
   
95 2.8
Cool Planet Energy Systems
   
102 2.9
DuPont Biofuels Solutions
   
95 2.7
Edeniq
   
77 2.6
*The Rating Score is the weighted average calculated by dividing the sum of all weighted ratings by the number of total responses.
5If you rated a technology "will never" or "not now" in terms of commercial readiness, what aspects are you skeptical about? 
 
 1 = Viable CAPEX/OPEX , 2 = Feedstock Costs , 3 = Feedstock availability , 4 = Insufficient rates, titers, yields etc , 5 = Viable market for the products
Answer
12345
Number of
  Responses
Rating
Score*
Enerkem
   
87 2.3
Fiberight
   
71 2.5
Fulcrum Bioenergy
   
75 2.3
Granbio
   
79 2.5
Green Biologics
   
66 2.7
ICM
   
57 2.5
Inbicon
   
75 2.3
INEOS Bio
   
80 2.3
Iogen
   
92 2.4
Licella
   
64 2.3
*The Rating Score is the weighted average calculated by dividing the sum of all weighted ratings by the number of total responses.
6For each company listed below, what ONE attribute most describes that brand?
 
 1 = Leader , 2 = Commercially viable , 3 = Innovative , 4 = Sustainable , 5 = Diversified
Answer
12345
Number of
  Responses
Rating
Score*
Abengoa Bioenergy
   
187 3.0
POET-DSM
   
200 2.4
DuPont Biofuels Solutions
   
190 2.7
Novozymes
   
197 2.2
Solazyme
   
174 2.9
*The Rating Score is the weighted average calculated by dividing the sum of all weighted ratings by the number of total responses.


7What is your role in cellulosic biofuels? (check all that apply) 
 
Answer
0%100%
Number of
Responses
Response
Ratio
Project developer
   
53 21.4%
Technology developer or licensor
   
84 34.0%
Feedstock supplier / grower
   
29 11.7%
Policymaker or advisor
   
13 5.2%
Scientist or engineer, or elsewhere active in R&D
   
80 32.3%
Logistics or systems provider
   
9 3.6%
Consultant or advisor
   
55 22.2%
Other stakeholder (e.g. fuel or by-product customer, NGO etc)
   
6 2.4%
Economic development professional
   
11 4.4%
Enthusiast or consumer, but not directly active in the industry
   
20 8.0%
Media or analyst
   
6 2.4%
Investor
   
20 8.0%
Strategic partner/investor
   
20 8.0%
Other
   
28 11.3%
 Totals247100%